Law Society of Ontario (LSO) Paralegal Practice Exam 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

The voir dire process is a critical pre-trial procedure that focuses on assessing the admissibility of evidence, typically involving matters that may be sensitive or prejudicial. By describing the process as one that "restricts access to certain evidence for the jury," this statement encapsulates the essential function of voir dire, which is to determine whether specific evidence can be presented to the jury based on its relevance, reliability, or potential to cause prejudice. This process may take place outside the presence of the jury to ensure that juror impartiality is not compromised by exposure to evidence that may be inadmissible.

During a voir dire, the judge evaluates the circumstances under which evidence was obtained, or the qualifications of expert witnesses, without the jury's knowledge. If certain evidence is deemed inadmissible, the jury will be kept unaware of this information, effectively restricting their access to it during the trial. This ensures that the jury's decision is based only on appropriate, legally admissible evidence, thus preserving the integrity of the trial process.

The other options do not accurately reflect the nature of the voir dire process: it is not a formal trial or merely a selection process for jurors, and it typically involves closed discussions rather than public discussions of sensitive evidence. Understanding this